This post on h-t has caused my interest and question:
Can you explain why retarding timing increases cylinder temps? Think about it, overretarded timing would mean that peak burn rate would occur too far after TDC, which simply means that less of the pressure generated by the burn would contribute to pushing the piston down, as the piston would tend to "run away" from the burn. However, the burn *should* still be complete. Perhaps this delay in burn, when delayed too far, can cause the burn to happen into the exhaust stroke, which would mean *much* higher EGT's. HOWEVER, this is really not detrimental to the actual combustion chamber and should NOT have an effect on peak cylinder temps, as the peak temp is still the same (possibly less). The only real effect is that the EGTs are higher b/c the burn happened closer to the exhaust stroke...
Am I correct in my reasoning here? I mean, theorhetically, you could retard the timing to all hell and it shouldnt matter since the next stroke will always be the exhaust stroke, and there is basically no stress on the engine during that stroke.
originally posted by nonvtecD » said:More boost certainly doesn't make a safer tune. Adding fuel and retarding timing will make a safer tune but retarding the timing too much can cause excessive cylinder temperature which isn't good either. Having a good standalone and a good tuner are the keys to a good tune.
Can you explain why retarding timing increases cylinder temps? Think about it, overretarded timing would mean that peak burn rate would occur too far after TDC, which simply means that less of the pressure generated by the burn would contribute to pushing the piston down, as the piston would tend to "run away" from the burn. However, the burn *should* still be complete. Perhaps this delay in burn, when delayed too far, can cause the burn to happen into the exhaust stroke, which would mean *much* higher EGT's. HOWEVER, this is really not detrimental to the actual combustion chamber and should NOT have an effect on peak cylinder temps, as the peak temp is still the same (possibly less). The only real effect is that the EGTs are higher b/c the burn happened closer to the exhaust stroke...
Am I correct in my reasoning here? I mean, theorhetically, you could retard the timing to all hell and it shouldnt matter since the next stroke will always be the exhaust stroke, and there is basically no stress on the engine during that stroke.